Monday, November 10, 2025

Self-Determination Theory (SDT):

 






Self-Determination Theory (SDT):


Definition

Self-Determination Theory (SDT), developed by Edward L. Deci and Richard M. Ryan, is a psychological theory of motivation that emphasizes the role of intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and psychological needs in driving human behavior, learning, and well-being.

SDT proposes that people are most motivated and thrive when their basic psychological needs are satisfied.


Core Components

  1. Types of Motivation
    Motivation is not just “present” or “absent”—SDT distinguishes between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation:
    • Intrinsic motivation: Doing an activity for its inherent satisfaction (e.g., reading for pleasure, learning a new skill because it’s fun).
    • Extrinsic motivation: Doing an activity to achieve an external outcome (e.g., studying for grades, working for money).
  2. SDT further categorizes extrinsic motivation along a continuum:
    • External regulation – Behavior controlled by external rewards/punishments.
    • Introjected regulation – Behavior driven by internal pressures (guilt, shame, ego).
    • Identified regulation – Behavior accepted as personally important.
    • Integrated regulation – Behavior fully aligned with one’s values and sense of self.


  1. Basic Psychological Needs
    SDT states that all humans have three innate psychological needs:

15

When these needs are fulfilled, motivation and well-being increase; when thwarted, motivation decreases, and psychological distress may occur.

4 Description

5 Effect if satisfied

6 Autonomy

7 Feeling in control of one’s own behavior and decisions

8 Increases intrinsic motivation and engagement

9 Competence

10 Feeling effective and capable in activities

11 Enhances mastery, confidence, and persistence

12 Relatedness

13 Feeling connected to others and having meaningful relationships

14 Supports emotional well-being and cooperation

  1. Applications
    SDT has been widely applied in:
    • Education: Supporting student autonomy and competence improves learning outcomes.
    • Workplace: Enhancing employee autonomy and meaningfulness boosts engagement and job satisfaction.
    • Health & Sports: Autonomy-supportive environments increase adherence to exercise, diet, and therapy.
    • Technology & AI in learning: Gamification and adaptive tools work better when they support autonomy, competence, and relatedness.


  1. Key Idea
    “People are naturally inclined to grow, learn, and develop, but optimal motivation and well-being depend on social environments that satisfy autonomy, competence, and relatedness.”


a clear table connecting Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to teaching strategies for a classroom context, especially relevant for elementary or higher education:

SDT Need

Definition

Classroom Strategies

Expected Student Outcomes

Autonomy

Feeling in control of one’s actions and choices

- Offer students meaningful choices in assignments or projects

- Encourage self-directed learning and goal setting

- Use open-ended questions rather than only directives

- Increased intrinsic motivation

- Greater engagement

- More creativity and ownership of learning

Competence

Feeling effective and capable in tasks

- Provide clear instructions and feedback

- Scaffold learning for gradual mastery

- Set achievable, challenging tasks

- Higher confidence in skills

- Persistence in difficult tasks

- Improved academic performance

Relatedness

Feeling connected to others and valued in social relationships

- Promote group work and collaboration

- Build a supportive classroom environment

- Encourage peer feedback and teacher-student rapport

- Greater sense of belonging

- Enhanced cooperation and social skills

- Emotional well-being and motivation

💡 Practical tip:
A teacher can combine all three by designing project-based learning: students choose a topic (autonomy), receive guidance and feedback to succeed (competence), and work in groups with discussion (relatedness). This maximizes motivation according to SDT.



a table connecting Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to AI-assisted learning, showing how generative AI tools can support autonomy, competence, and relatedness:

SDT Need

AI Application / Strategy

Example in Classroom

Expected Student Outcomes

Autonomy

AI offers personalized learning paths and choice

- AI tutoring systems let students choose topics or difficulty levels

- Generative AI allows students to create their own content (stories, projects, presentations)

- Increased intrinsic motivation

- Greater ownership of learning

- Exploration of personal interests

Competence

AI provides immediate feedback and scaffolding

- AI tools give instant corrections in writing or math exercises

- Adaptive AI suggests hints or resources when a student struggles

- Improved skill mastery

- Boosted confidence

- Persistence in challenging tasks

Relatedness

AI facilitates collaboration and connection

- AI-supported platforms enable group work with shared documents and AI suggestions

- AI chatbots mediate peer discussions or mentor guidance

- Enhanced peer collaboration

- Stronger sense of classroom community

- Emotional support and engagement

💡 Practical tip:
Teachers can use AI not to replace instruction but to enhance SDT needs. For example, letting students generate their own quiz questions with AI supports autonomy and competence, while collaborating in AI-assisted group projects enhances relatedness.


a comprehensive table combining traditional teaching strategies and AI-assisted strategies through the lens of Self-Determination Theory (SDT):

SDT Need

Traditional Teaching Strategies

AI-Assisted Learning Strategies

Expected Student Outcomes

Autonomy

- Offer choices in assignments or projects

- Encourage self-directed learning

- Use open-ended questions

- AI tutoring systems allow topic/difficulty selection

- Generative AI enables creation of stories, presentations, or projects

- Greater ownership of learning

- Increased intrinsic motivation

- Exploration of personal interests

Competence

- Provide clear instructions and feedback

- Scaffold learning for mastery

- Set achievable, challenging tasks

- AI gives instant feedback on exercises

- Adaptive AI offers hints or resources when students struggle

- Improved mastery of skills

- Boosted confidence

- Persistence in challenging tasks

Relatedness

- Promote group work and collaboration

- Build supportive classroom environment

- Encourage peer feedback and teacher-student rapport

- AI platforms support collaborative projects

- AI chatbots facilitate peer discussions or mentor guidance

- Enhanced collaboration

- Stronger sense of classroom community

- Emotional support and engagement

💡 Key Insight:
AI tools amplify traditional teaching strategies rather than replace them. By intentionally designing activities that satisfy autonomy, competence, and relatedness, teachers can maximize student motivation and engagement in both in-person and hybrid learning environments.

Technology Task Fit (TTF) Overview

 






Technology Task Fit (TTF) Overview

Definition:
Technology Task Fit (TTF) is a theoretical model that evaluates how well a technology supports a specific task. The better the fit between the technology's capabilities and the task requirements, the more likely users will perform effectively and adopt the technology.

Key Idea:

  • If a technology matches the requirements of a task, it improves performance and user satisfaction.
  • If the technology is poorly aligned with the task, it may be underutilized or even hinder performance.


Components of TTF

  1. Task Characteristics:
    • Nature of the task: complexity, routine, interdependence.
    • Requirements: speed, accuracy, communication needs.
  2. Technology Characteristics:
    • Features: tools, functionalities, usability.
    • Accessibility and reliability.
  3. Fit:
    • The degree to which the technology meets task requirements.
    • High fit → higher performance and satisfaction.
    • Low fit → lower performance, frustration, or abandonment.


TTF Model in Practice

  • Example in Education:
    • Task: Writing essays collaboratively.
    • Technology: Google Docs.
    • Fit: High, because it allows real-time collaboration, commenting, and version control.
  • Example in Workplace:
    • Task: Data analysis.
    • Technology: Spreadsheet software vs. specialized data visualization tool.
    • Fit: The specialized tool may provide a better TTF for complex data tasks.


TTF and Technology Adoption

TTF is closely related to user performance and technology adoption. If TTF is high:

  • Users are more likely to adopt the technology.
  • Task efficiency and quality improve.

If TTF is low:

  • Technology may be underutilized or replaced.
  • Users may experience frustration.


a clear table summarizing Technology Task Fit (TTF):

Aspect

Description

Example

Task Characteristics

Features of the task: complexity, routine, interdependence, required output.

Writing an essay collaboratively, analyzing sales data, or reporting.

Technology Characteristics

Features of technology: usability, functionality, accessibility, reliability.

Google Docs, Excel, Zoom, or a specialized data analysis software.

Fit

The degree to which technology meets task requirements.

High fit: Google Docs for collaborative writing; Low fit: Excel for data visualization.

Outcome

Effect on performance, adoption, and satisfaction.

High TTF → increased efficiency, satisfaction, and adoption. Low TTF → frustration, poor performance.

more detailed TTF table with indicators and possible ways to measure them, suitable for research purposes:

TTF Component

Indicators

Measurement / Example

Task Characteristics

- Task complexity

- Task interdependence

- Task routine

- Task significance

Survey items asking: “How complex is this task?” (Likert scale 1–5), observation, task analysis

Technology Characteristics

- Functionality

- Usability

- Accessibility

- Reliability

Survey items: “The system provides all functions needed for my task” (Likert 1–5); system logs; usability tests

Technology-Task Fit (Fit)

- Degree to which technology meets task requirements

- Task-technology alignment

Perception surveys: “The technology helps me complete my tasks efficiently” (1–5); performance metrics

Individual Outcome

- User performance

- Task completion quality

- Productivity

Task completion time, error rates, output quality, supervisor ratings

Behavioral Outcome

- Technology adoption

- User satisfaction

- Continued use intention

Survey items: “I am satisfied with using this technology” (1–5); adoption rate; frequency of use logs


a concise TTF research framework table that combines all elements in a way suitable for a journal or thesis:

Component

Definition / Description

Indicators

Measurement / Data Source

Task Characteristics

Features of the task that need to be accomplished

Complexity, interdependence, routine, significance

Survey, observation, task analysis

Technology Characteristics

Features of the technology that support task completion

Functionality, usability, accessibility, reliability

Survey, system logs, usability testing

Technology-Task Fit (TTF)

Degree of alignment between technology and task requirements

Perceived usefulness, task support, efficiency

Survey items, performance metrics, user ratings

Individual Outcome

Effect of TTF on user performance

Task completion quality, productivity, efficiency

Task performance metrics, supervisor ratings, output quality

Behavioral Outcome

Effect of TTF on technology adoption and satisfaction

User satisfaction, adoption intention, continued use

Survey, frequency of use logs, adoption rate

This table essentially links task, technology, fit, and outcomes in one framework—perfect for both theoretical explanation and empirical research.