The ICAP framework is a model developed by Michelene T. H. Chi and colleagues that explains how different types of learning activities relate to levels of student engagement and learning outcomes.
ICAP is an acronym for Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive, representing a hierarchy of cognitive engagement:
-
Passive
-
Students receive information without overt engagement (e.g., listening to a lecture, reading slides without taking notes).
-
Lowest level of engagement → least effective for deep learning.
-
-
Active
-
Students engage in behaviors that involve manipulating instructional materials, but without adding new ideas (e.g., highlighting, underlining, copying notes, practicing drills).
-
Increases attention but still surface-level learning.
-
-
Constructive
-
Students generate new ideas, connections, or inferences beyond the given material (e.g., self-explaining, summarizing in their own words, drawing concept maps, asking questions).
-
Leads to deeper understanding.
-
-
Interactive
-
Students engage in dialogue with others (peers/teachers), co-constructing knowledge by building on each other’s contributions (e.g., collaborative problem-solving, debates, peer teaching).
-
Highest level of engagement → most effective for meaningful and long-term learning.
-
Key Points
-
The framework is hierarchical: Interactive > Constructive > Active > Passive.
-
It is widely used in instructional design and classroom practice to promote deeper learning.
-
Teachers can apply ICAP by designing tasks that encourage students to move from passive reception to active manipulation, then to constructive idea generation, and finally to interactive co-construction.
Mode | Student Behavior | Examples | Learning Outcome |
Passive | Receiving information without overt engagement | Listening to a lecture, watching a video, reading slides | Lowest – minimal retention, surface learning |
Active | Manipulating material without adding new ideas | Highlighting, underlining, copying notes, practicing drills | Moderate – better attention, but limited understanding |
Constructive | Generating new ideas or connections beyond the given material | Summarizing in own words, self-explaining, drawing concept maps, asking questions | High – deeper understanding, long-term learning |
Interactive | Dialoguing and co-constructing knowledge with others | Group discussions, debates, peer teaching, collaborative problem-solving | Highest – strongest understanding, transferable knowledge |


No comments:
Post a Comment